Comments on: End game in Bb-D2L patent fight? http://sakaiblog.korcuska.net/2009/07/27/bb-patent-goals/ Occasional thoughts and updates about Sakai Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:28:56 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: JOLT Digest » Blackboard, Inc. v. Desire2Learn, Inc. | Harvard Journal of Law & Technology http://sakaiblog.korcuska.net/2009/07/27/bb-patent-goals/#comment-2098 JOLT Digest » Blackboard, Inc. v. Desire2Learn, Inc. | Harvard Journal of Law & Technology Fri, 21 Aug 2009 03:11:59 +0000 http://sakaiblog.korcuska.net/?p=523#comment-2098 [...] Patent Prospector summarize the opinion. Inside Higher Ed provides commentary about the decision. Sakai Blog speculates about Blackboard’s motives and the future of Blackboard’s numerous patent [...] [...] Patent Prospector summarize the opinion. Inside Higher Ed provides commentary about the decision. Sakai Blog speculates about Blackboard’s motives and the future of Blackboard’s numerous patent [...]

]]> By: Michael Korcuska http://sakaiblog.korcuska.net/2009/07/27/bb-patent-goals/#comment-2065 Michael Korcuska Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:21:25 +0000 http://sakaiblog.korcuska.net/?p=523#comment-2065 Matt Small, Bb's Chief Business Officer, provides the official answer to the question in <a href="http://campustechnology.com/articles/2009/07/27/appellate-court-overturns-blackboard-patent-blackboard-to-press-on.aspx?sc_lang=en" rel="nofollow">this Campus Technology article</a>: "The important fact here is that we are asking Dersire2Learn to either pay a reasonable royalty or make a valid workaround rather than using our intellectual property. And we believe they are infringing multiple patents of ours, and we will continue to pursue what we believe is a fair result in the appropriate venues." Matt Small, Bb’s Chief Business Officer, provides the official answer to the question in this Campus Technology article:

“The important fact here is that we are asking Dersire2Learn to either pay a reasonable royalty or make a valid workaround rather than using our intellectual property. And we believe they are infringing multiple patents of ours, and we will continue to pursue what we believe is a fair result in the appropriate venues.”

]]>